- From: <marcos@marcosc.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 03:45:45 +1100
- To: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
- Cc: spec-prod <spec-prod@w3.org>, Elika Etemad <fantasai@inkedblade.net>
> On 21 Feb 2017, at 3:23 am, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net> wrote: > > In specs I work on (JSON-LD and others) ednote is used during development to communicate status between editors. Issues, at tied back to GitHub and cover more long-standing discussions about spec content that are usually not simple editorial points. Please keep ednote. Just to be clear, ednotes are not going away :) the question is if we, as a community, want to see them styled differently from regular notes. > > Gregg Kellogg > gregg@greggkellogg.net > >> On Feb 19, 2017, at 6:44 PM, Marcos Caceres <marcos@marcosc.com> wrote: >> >> Hi Spec Editors, >> >> Some specs feature "editors notes", which are notes that an editor >> leaves for the reader or for themselves for whatever reason. These >> editors notes are styled in the same way as regular notes (green box, >> with a bold "heading"). >> >> We are wondering, should such editors notes be stylistically >> distinguished from regular spec notes (and, should they be included at >> all in specs)? >> >> If the answer is "yes, they should be styled differently": then we >> should decide on how to distinguish them in "base.css" (see [1]). >> >> If the answer is "no, just keep them the same", then ReSpec will >> automagically start to convert them to "notes" (by changing the css >> class value to from "ednote" to "note"). If I don't hear any >> responses, I'll assume "no" and change ReSpec to match. >> >> Kind regards, >> Marcos >> >> [1] https://github.com/w3c/tr-design/issues/110 >> >
Received on Monday, 20 February 2017 16:46:23 UTC