- From: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2016 08:46:25 +0100
- To: Philippe Le Hégaret <plh@w3.org>, Marcos Caceres <marcos@marcosc.com>
- Cc: spec-prod <spec-prod@w3.org>, Ilya Grigorik <igrigorik@google.com>, François Daoust <fd@w3.org>
On 08/12/2016 17:56, Philippe Le Hégaret wrote: > > > On 11/28/2016 12:41 AM, Marcos Caceres wrote: >> Hi ReSpec users, >> I'm trying to get a sense of who is still using old school WebIDL. >> Could you please email me if you are? >> >> As it's been deprecated for a few years, and it's now conflicting with >> things, I'd like to remove it for xmas. I'm happy to help people >> migrate over to new school WebIDL: >> >> https://github.com/w3c/respec/wiki/WebIDL-Guide > > * https://w3c.github.io/navigation-timing/ > * https://w3c.github.io/resource-hints/ > > Those two are lagging behind other webperf specs. It's not hard work to > convert but it will take 3 to 4 hours to do so manually :( As a reminder, I have a script that can help convert ReSpec old-school to contiguous: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/spec-prod/2016AprJun/0064.html (copying François who is the last person I know who used it in case he has more insights on how usable it still is) Dom
Received on Friday, 9 December 2016 07:46:35 UTC