W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > spec-prod@w3.org > July to September 2016

Re: Relaxing mailing list requirement

From: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 07:59:05 +0200
Message-ID: <CAAwChxMm6Z0a0EH3MHcg7Rv9RCGevm=A7jAon3DCreUyLs=F4A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Cc: spec-prod <spec-prod@w3.org>, Marcos Caceres <marcos@marcosc.com>, Denis Ah-Kang <denis@w3.org>
On August 20, 2016 at 4:43:00 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. (jackalmage@gmail.com) wrote:
> The email archive link is intentional and should be preserved. While
> I love using GitHub as our issue tracker, it's not appropriate to rely
> on GitHub the company as our history-maintainer.

Agree. I was not suggesting otherwise.

> Setting up a mailing
> list that receives all GH Issues mail (or just repurposing the groups
> main list for that purpose) is easy.

Yep, is what we do.

> For actual collab, tho, Specberus allows either a mailing list *or* a
> GH Issues link, as you note.

Yeah, I think I need to just update ReSpec's templates to allow
developers to say "we prefer feedback on GitHub... historical archive
of issues is captured in mailing list X".
Received on Monday, 22 August 2016 05:59:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 22 August 2016 05:59:35 UTC