W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > spec-prod@w3.org > July to September 2016

Re: ReSpec: linter

From: Shane McCarron <shane@halindrome.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 14:09:15 -0500
Message-ID: <CAJdbnOCFuUoApwEfxGdM28xEdhqxtr15j5LHPuJzEAmiRN8rBg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
Cc: spec-prod <spec-prod@w3.org>
Good ideas...  except for xml:lang.  Rdfa can use that in some
circumstances.
On Jul 14, 2016 2:05 PM, <ishida@w3.org> wrote:

> On 14/07/2016 14:13, Shane McCarron wrote:
>
>> BTW I have suggested we also add some a11y checking to this.  I don't
>> yet know what that will be.  I am asking the APA and ARIA groups for
>> input on it.  But I wonder if there shouldn't also be a check for an
>> a11y considerations section.  I have raised an issue against specberus
>> to discuss that with the relevant players. [1]  Please feel free to
>> comment here or against that issue.
>>
>
> Perhaps we could check for some basic i18n stuff too.  For example:
> - html tag should have lang attribute
> - char encoding must be present and must be utf-8
> - char encoding must be within 1024 bytes of page start
> - meta content-language should not be used
> - xml:lang attributes should not appear in the page
>
>
> ri
>
>
Received on Thursday, 14 July 2016 19:09:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 14 July 2016 19:09:46 UTC