W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > spec-prod@w3.org > July to September 2016

Some missing docs?

From: Rick Byers <rbyers@google.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2016 16:30:21 -0400
Message-ID: <CAFUtAY_YzzR-vXfCzitz_-61kCbeZQSr0hKAftpBtqdFgihVOg@mail.gmail.com>
To: spec-prod@w3.org, cere@google.com
Hi,
The ReSpec user's guide
<https://www.google.ca/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwjh0q3Mk93NAhVl3IMKHXy4CR0QFggjMAE&url=https%3A%2F%2Fw3c.github.io%2Frespec-docs%2Fguide.html&usg=AFQjCNH52Iah4HkL_ENYsLQ6qeH0SBODNA&sig2=48W533_fpE1Etvzsb-IHQg&bvm=bv.126130881,d.amc>
used
to contain a bunch of guidance on how to properly do linking including to
other specs (eg. [[SPEC]] vs. [[!SPEC]] syntax).  As far as I can tell,
none of that documentation has survived in the new wiki
<https://github.com/w3c/respec/wiki>.  Am I just missing it?  If the wiki
is indeed still incomplete, are the old docs still saved somewhere (better
than the Google cache
<https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:ZcAfTUz-uKgJ:https://w3c.github.io/respec-docs/guide.html+&cd=2&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=ca>
I've been using)?

The specific question I was looking for was whether it's possible to refer
to the ED version of a spec (and ideally a specific anchor inside the spec
instead of just to the whole document generally).  I'm guessing the answer
is no, and for both cases I should just use <a> tags with explicit URLs,
right?

Thanks,
   Rick
Received on Tuesday, 5 July 2016 20:31:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 5 July 2016 20:31:11 UTC