- From: Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 14:13:51 -0500
- To: Tobie Langel <tobie@codespeaks.com>, spec-prod@w3.org
On 10/03/2016 2:06 PM, Tobie Langel wrote: > On Thu, 10 Mar 2016, at 19:53, Michael Cooper wrote: >> There are still changes impacting publication; this version is adding >> "It is expected to become a W3C Note." for a Note-track document that >> pubrules rejects; the previous version did not add that, and is accepted >> by pubrules. This is the one giving me pain right now but there may be >> others. The output of the new respec needs checking against pubrules >> before it can be considered fixed. Michael > I'm sure a pull request fixing this would be most welcome. :) When I'm in publication hell, exacerbated by a recently broken tool, trying to learn the code in order to submit a pull request is just not possible. I just don't have time to deal with that. Michael > > --tobie >
Received on Thursday, 10 March 2016 19:14:00 UTC