Re: ReSpec updated

Interesting - 1) I didn't know we were publishing any notes right now, and
2) Happy to rip that out if it shouldn't be there.  URI?

On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org> wrote:

> There are still changes impacting publication; this version is adding "It
> is expected to become a W3C Note." for a Note-track document that pubrules
> rejects; the previous version did not add that, and is accepted by
> pubrules. This is the one giving me pain right now but there may be others.
> The output of the new respec needs checking against pubrules before it can
> be considered fixed. Michael
>
>
> On 10/03/2016 1:36 PM, Shane McCarron wrote:
>
>> Okay - we have a stable ReSpec pushed that supports the new stylesheets
>> etc. by default, and has a number of other changes.  Sorry for the delay.
>> Thanks to Marcos for all his late nights and hard work to get this stable
>> again!
>>
>> --
>> -Shane
>>
>
>


-- 
-Shane