Re: Support for the new W3C license?

Hi Denis,
Unfortunately I'm told there is still a problem:

From:   James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
To:     Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, Arnaud Le Hors/Cupertino/IBM@IBMUS
Date:   10/01/2015 08:37 AM
Subject:        still having echidna issues



Attempting to publish the updated drafts with the new license. Still
getting errors related to the copyright statement.

Name: ascore
URL: 
http://jasnell.github.io/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/activitystreams-core/manifest

Status Key: 31b1b7da-4f87-42d9-9b53-4d2ba7acd7ff
Last Attempt: 2015-10-01T15:25:11.877Z
id
31b1b7da-4f87-42d9-9b53-4d2ba7acd7ff
url
http://jasnell.github.io/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/activitystreams-core/manifest

version                                    1.3.1
version-specberus                          1.2.1
decision
http://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/2015-09-15-minutes
results.status                             failure
results.jobs.retrieve-resources.status     ok
results.jobs.retrieve-resources.errors
results.jobs.specberus.status              failure
results.jobs.specberus.errors.0.key        no-match
results.jobs.specberus.errors.0.type       headers.copyright
results.jobs.specberus.errors.1.key        link-text
results.jobs.specberus.errors.1.extra.href
http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/copyright-documents
results.jobs.specberus.errors.1.extra.text document use
results.jobs.specberus.errors.1.type       headers.copyright

--
Arnaud  Le Hors - Senior Technical Staff Member, Open Web Technologies - 
IBM Software Group


Denis Ah-Kang <denis@w3.org> wrote on 09/29/2015 09:37:34 PM:

> From: Denis Ah-Kang <denis@w3.org>
> To: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>, Philippe Le Hegaret 
> <plh@w3.org>, Arnaud Le Hors/Cupertino/IBM@IBMUS
> Cc: spec-prod@w3.org
> Date: 09/29/2015 09:37 PM
> Subject: Re: Support for the new W3C license?
> 
> 
> 
> On 09/30/2015 12:17 AM, Marcos Caceres wrote:
> > On September 29, 2015 at 2:34:28 PM, Philippe Le Hegaret (plh@w3.org) 
wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 09/29/2015 01:39 PM, Philippe Le Hegaret wrote:
> >>> The text differs so respec would need to be fixed but... I still 
can't
> >>> get specberus (the pubrules checker used for automatic publishing) 
to
> >>> accept a text. So still looking around before propose a change 
somewhere.
> >>
> >> We need a fix for respec:
> >> https://github.com/w3c/respec/pull/509
> >>
> >> and the latest of specberus to get deployed.
> >>
> >> Should be all in sync within 12 hours or so.
> >
> > Fixed in ReSpec.
> >
> 
> Specberus and Echidna have been deployed with the latest updates.
> 
> Denis
>