W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > spec-prod@w3.org > April to June 2015

Re: New publication workflow: Echidna 1.2.0, Specberus 1.1.0

From: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2015 13:15:21 -0400
To: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
Cc: Spec-prod <spec-prod@w3.org>, Antonio Olmo Titos <antonio@w3.org>
Message-ID: <etPan.556c93a1.d2e47e3.276@Zero-privacy.local>



On June 1, 2015 at 1:04:21 PM, Steve Faulkner (faulkner.steve@gmail.com) wrote:
> On 1 June 2015 at 17:49, Marcos Caceres wrote:
>  
> > Shouldn't a Note be the final "final state" for a document? I.e., every
> > document is a working draft until it finally becomes a Note/REC/Whatever.
> > If so, then your document could be auto published as a working draft - but
> > just include some text in the status saying that "this is going to be a W3C
> > Note at some point".
>  
>  
> that's right, but I think its the boiler plate that needs to be modified to
> reflect the note track status.
> so maybe need a flag to set the boilerplate to note/rec track?

Ok, is this a ReSpec doc? Can you send me a link? 
Received on Monday, 1 June 2015 17:17:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 1 June 2015 17:17:56 UTC