W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > spec-prod@w3.org > October to December 2014

Re: Spec authoring tools

From: Tobie Langel <tobie.langel@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 11:49:53 +0100
Message-ID: <CAMK=o4eyjzgHUZDDbj8DKatUEAO+G83n9bT_KfUQOjDcwWjpnQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>
Cc: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>, "spec-prod@w3.org Prod" <spec-prod@w3.org>
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org> wrote:

> On 15/12/2014 01:25 , Marcos Caceres wrote:
>
>> On December 13, 2014 at 2:36:53 AM, Robin Berjon (robin@w3.org) wrote:
>>
>>> In addition to those that Tab mentioned there's also XMLSpec.
>>>>
>>> It's still
>>> used a fair bit, but if you're sticking to "Web" specs you should
>>> be in the clear.
>>>
>>
>> I think WebIDL uses this :)
>>
>
> Hahaha. No.
>
> WebIDL, unless I am mistaken, uses its own weird homegrown XSLT 1.0
> processor that converts a format that is 95% XHTML with some extra XML
> stuff. In that way it is a fair bit like the ancestral version of ReSpec:
>

That's it. I give up.
Received on Monday, 15 December 2014 10:50:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:42:21 UTC