Re: Spec authoring tools

On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 10:04 PM, David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> wrote:

> On 12/12/2014 18:40, Tobie Langel wrote:
>
>> Would XPath 3.0[1] be a good example of the output of that authoring tool?
>
> well personally I prefer MathML 3 [1]:-)


Which uses concatenated &nbsp; entities to mimic nested content in the ToC.
#sadpanda

OK, so I probably won't be supporting those for now. :(

--tobie

Received on Friday, 12 December 2014 21:15:15 UTC