W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > spec-prod@w3.org > October to December 2014

Re: [restyle] Questionnaire wrt Redesign of the W3C Spec Templates

From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 20:02:51 +1100
Message-ID: <CAHp8n2m-YYk6x8YChSOmg8D_pww=d1tnnOsn82Zip9hvWHskhA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "spec-prod@w3.org" <spec-prod@w3.org>
Following in Brad's footsteps...

On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 8:42 AM, Brad Hill <hillbrad@fb.com> wrote:
>    1. Give me 3-5 adjectives for how the visual design of
>       a W3C spec should "feel".

clean, all relevant things hyperlinked together, linked to test cases


>    2. List the URLs to 3 specs that are representative of
>       your WG's output (especially wrt markup and structure
>       of the content).

Diverse groups, but here you are:

http://dev.w3.org/html5/html-sourcing-inband-tracks/ (CG spec)
http://dev.w3.org/html5/webvtt/
http://www.w3.org/TR/html/


>    3. Do you have any documentation of your markup conventions?
>       Please paste URLs:
>
>    4. What spec processing tools does your WG actively use?

ReSpec, SpecRef; HTML is custom, which is a PITN


>    5. What are your goals for the redesign?

I'm not fussed - I'll take what does the job and makes it easy to
publish an easily readable spec.


>    6. Is there anything else we should know / consider?

Please make sure to make it easy to link between specs to definitions.

Thanks,
Silvia.
Received on Wednesday, 15 October 2014 09:03:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:42:21 UTC