- From: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 14:22:32 -0400
- To: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>
- Cc: "spec-prod@w3.org" <spec-prod@w3.org>
On Fri, 2013-10-25 at 13:06 +0200, Robin Berjon wrote: > I think that the most sensible approach for this would be: > > • /TR/shortname/ always points to the latest and greatest. For HTML, > that would be the current master branch. > • The editors can maintain a separate "stable" (or whatever) branch > where they prepare the snapshots that will be used. > • The draft can be exposed elsewhere if people need to review it (so > long as it's not snapshotted though there ought to be little value; > normally all the bugs fixed there should be fixed in master too). > • If absolutely needed, we could expose an > /in-stabilisation/shortname/ endpoint, but I don't think that's needed. > > Does this make sense? Makes sense to me. I'm curious what others think. Philippe
Received on Friday, 25 October 2013 18:22:35 UTC