- From: Tobie Langel <tobie@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 18:15:33 +0200
- To: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.com>
- Cc: "spec-prod@w3.org" <spec-prod@w3.org>
On Oct 22, 2013, at 17:58, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.com> wrote: > On Oct 22, 2013, at 7:41 AM, Tobie Langel <tobie@w3.org> wrote: > >> On Tuesday, October 22, 2013 at 4:33 PM, Gregg Kellogg wrote: >>> Thanks for this! We could have really used this for the JSON-LD work. Nice to have it in place for the future. >>> >>> Any thoughts on syncing the other way? >> Do you mean including issues created on GitHub into the spec? Or do you mean pulling in modifications made on GitHub of an issue initially created within the spec? > > Actually, I was thinking of syncing W3C Tracker issues with the GitHub issue tracker and visa-versa. Keeping ReSpec synced with the GitHub tracker is great, and we've done this manually for JSON-LD, but we have an issue with using two different tracking systems. It would certainly be possible if W3C tracker has the right API. (I'm not sure about that however.) --tobie
Received on Tuesday, 22 October 2013 16:15:47 UTC