RE: ReSpec 3.2

>I am about to release ReSpec 3.2, which is a fairly major change. I've run a fair
>number of tests (from the test suite and additional ones) and it appears to be
>behaving well, but you never know.

Lovely! Thank you, Robin.

>I am seeing quite a few drafts with warnings, notably people thinking they're
>referencing definitions that aren't there :)

I'm guilty here, but merely ten times. :-) Thanks for this functionality!!!

Otherwise, a cursory glance looks good.

Received on Friday, 18 October 2013 15:34:09 UTC