- From: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org>
- Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2013 14:21:36 +0100
- To: shane@aptest.com
- CC: Shane McCarron <ahby@aptest.com>, Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>, "spec-prod@w3.org Prod" <spec-prod@w3.org>, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>, Tantek Çelik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu>, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Le 03/07/2013 14:07, Shane McCarron a écrit : > I agree with much of this. However, I would not like to see working > groups be able to update documents in the final states of the process > (e.g., CR, PR, REC, PER) without staff review and approval. Those are > the lawyer documents, and W3C has liability and responsibility. I think we can make the actual publication much easier (eg. not require coordination of several people) without changing the requirements for review and approval. Just because you have technical access to do something doesn’t mean you are allowed to do it, it’s just a matter of trust and ability to clean up in case someone abuses that trust. But yes, we could start for example with just WDs and see how it goes. > But otherwise... yes, please. Let's find a way to let people like *us* > who have been authoring / editing W3C specs longer than much of the > staff have been there easily push updates when the working group asks us > to. Right now the process is just way too painful. -- Simon Sapin
Received on Wednesday, 3 July 2013 13:21:58 UTC