- From: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 12:12:52 +0200
- To: Tobie Langel <tobie@w3.org>
- CC: spec-prod@w3.org, Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
On 25/06/2013 12:09 , Tobie Langel wrote: > On Tuesday, June 25, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Robin Berjon wrote: >> The only thing that I care about from the ReSpec point of view is >> performance. If you're only adding a few fields, it probably >> doesn't matter, but if you're adding enough that the output might >> start being noticeably slower to load and parse, then I'd rather >> the API that ReSpec uses stayed lean and mean. > > Most requests are clocking well above a single packet, so I don't > think even doubling the size of the output would have a significant > perf impact. That WFM. Incidentally, I wonder if gzip might help here. I should take the time to look at what kind of performance impact the current usage has to see if it's worth optimising or not (I suspect not, but where performance is concerned gut feelings are almost always wrong :). -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
Received on Tuesday, 25 June 2013 10:12:59 UTC