- From: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 07 May 2013 14:41:55 +0100
- To: spec-prod@w3.org
[sending here for the sake of completeness] [4] the This Version link that is generated is http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/NOTE-klreq-20130514/ it should be http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-klreq-20130514/ since this is just a FPWD. RI On 07/05/2013 13:14, Richard Ishida wrote: > [3] It produces a "Previous version:" subhead, though no pointer. This > shouldn't be there for a FPWD. > > RI > > > On 07/05/2013 13:05, Richard Ishida wrote: >> Annoyingly I have to keep fixing a couple of bugs while trying to >> publish a FPWD of a document intended to become a WG NOTE. Where should >> I report them? >> >> I'll report here for the time being. Spec status was set to FPWD-NOTE. >> >> [1] Status boilerplate: >> >> "This document was published by the Internationalization Working Group >> as a First Public Working Group Note" >> >> is ambiguous. I think respec should generate: >> >> "This document was published by the Internationalization Working Group >> as a First Public Working Draft. The group intends to publish this >> document as a Working Group Note" >> >> >> [2] Pubrules gives the following error: >> >> "Error. The W3C style sheet should be >> http://www.w3.org/StyleSheets/TR/W3C-WG-NOTE. It is currently >> //www.w3.org/StyleSheets/TR/W3C-WG-NOTE. " >> >> >> RI >> >> > > -- Richard Ishida, W3C http://rishida.net/
Received on Tuesday, 7 May 2013 13:42:24 UTC