W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > spec-prod@w3.org > October to December 2012

Re: Testing respec3

From: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 12:02:12 +0200
Message-ID: <50769924.1020207@w3.org>
To: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
CC: spec-prod@w3.org
On 11/10/2012 11:37 , Shane McCarron wrote:
> The problem I am seeing right now is that the core util tests are all
> failing. And they are failing because the 'require' statement is
> failing.  Basically it does not think the util.js is getting loaded.  I
> don't know why it doesn't think this because it clearly gets loaded
> once.  But then there is a second attempt to load it (according my local
> apache log) and that attempt uses an incorrect URI (/js/core/utils.js)
> for some reason.

That's weird. It all runs fine here. If utils.js don't load a lot of the 
rest should fail too. Is it possible that your server's configuration 
has a problem?

> While I have your attention, is there a way to tell what version of
> respec actually gets served up by the W3C Tools/respec/respec-w3c-common
> ?

Yes, the comment at the top of that file has the version number. It 
currently says:

/* ReSpec 3.1.27 - Robin Berjon, http://berjon.com/ (@robinberjon) */

If you're seeing something else, you likely have a cache problem.

>  It doesn't seem as if the diffmark stuff is being included when
> respec loads from there.  At least I can't make it appear from there,
> but when I work locally it appears (when I press ctrl-alt-shift-S).

Strange. Do you have a pointer to a document in which it doesn't work?

-- 
Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
Received on Thursday, 11 October 2012 10:02:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 11 October 2012 10:02:17 GMT