W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > spec-prod@w3.org > January to March 2012

Re: Fall mechanisms (Re: [Pubrules] Changes to enable use of HTML5)

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 12:58:18 -0700
Message-ID: <4F60F85A.8060009@inkedblade.net>
To: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
CC: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>, spec-prod <spec-prod@w3.org>
On 03/14/2012 12:48 PM, Philippe Le Hegaret wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-03-14 at 12:46 -0700, fantasai wrote:
>> Sorry, I seem to have missed some context here... what is the problem
>> with using<object>  and an external image reference?
>
> The context was inline SVG, so object wouldn't help I believe,

Well, the topic was fallbacks for inline SVG, but I don't see what the
context was. Why are we discussing fallbacks for SVG on spec-prod with
the assumption that using external references via <object> is out of
scope?

~fantasai
Received on Wednesday, 14 March 2012 19:58:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 14 March 2012 19:58:51 GMT