W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > spec-prod@w3.org > October to December 2011

Re: CC license on figures in specs?

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 14:53:09 +0100
To: spec-prod@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.v6k4uvkv64w2qv@annevk-macbookpro.local>
On Fri, 16 Dec 2011 14:45:38 +0100, Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> wrote:
> On 16 Dec 2011, at 7:39 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>> On Fri, 16 Dec 2011 14:11:39 +0100, Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> wrote:
>>> I don't think that situation is stable; I do not expect that licensing  
>>> approach is compatible.
>>
>> Are you saying that what the HTML WG is doing is problematic?
>
> I am talking about Editor's Drafts with different licenses. Is that what  
> you are referring to?

Yes. The HTML WG publishes text based on http://svn.whatwg.org/ which uses  
a different license than what the HTML WG publishes on TR/.

We could also discuss the DOM if you prefer. Which is was initially  
developed at http://simon.html5.org/specs/web-dom-core and then developed  
at https://bitbucket.org/ms2ger/dom-core/ and now jointly with the W3C  
also at http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/domcore/ (because of Mercurial the  
repository can be shared).


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Friday, 16 December 2011 13:56:23 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 10 March 2012 06:19:18 GMT