W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > spec-prod@w3.org > October to December 2011

Re: References Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications

From: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 20:23:18 +0000
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: Bert Bos <bert@w3.org>, chairs@w3.org, "spec-prod@w3.org" <spec-prod@w3.org>
Message-ID: <BD1746DA35CF45C58BEC4C4A40CCD3F6@marcosc.com>


-- 
Marcos Caceres


On Wednesday, December 14, 2011 at 8:21 PM, Julian Reschke wrote:

> On 2011-12-14 21:10, Marcos Caceres wrote:
> > On Wednesday, December 14, 2011 at 7:51 PM, Bert Bos wrote:
> > > 
> > > How about this:
> > > 
> > > https://www.w3.org/Style/Group/css3-src/biblio.xml
> > Now we are cooking!
> > 
> > Only problem, for me, is that the references point to the dates version of specs. Preferably, they should point to the latest published version.
> > 
> > So, instead of:
> > http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-2dcontext-20110525/
> > ...
> 
> I'd need this one.
> > What should be there is:
> > http://www.w3.org/TR/2dcontext/
> 
> But this one of course could be included as well.

Yes, no harm in including both. The more data the better  :)  
Received on Wednesday, 14 December 2011 20:23:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 10 March 2012 06:19:18 GMT