W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > spec-prod@w3.org > October to December 2011

Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications

From: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2011 13:57:59 +0100
To: "Karl Dubost" <karld@opera.com>, "Doug Schepers" <schepers@w3.org>
Cc: "Marcos Caceres" <w3c@marcosc.com>, "chairs@w3.org" <chairs@w3.org>, "spec-prod@w3.org" <spec-prod@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.v54eaxmfwxe0ny@widsith-3.local>
On Tue, 06 Dec 2011 22:47:15 +0100, Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org> wrote:

> Hey, Karl-
>
> On 12/5/11 2:38 PM, Karl Dubost wrote:
>> Quick because I'm offline.
>>
>> Le 1 déc. 2011 à 12:19, Marcos Caceres a écrit :
>>> 1. The *Status of the Document* is still ambiguous
>>> 2. There is cruft at the top of the document
>>> 3. What do the various stages actually mean
>>> 4. Do we really still need a bibliography when we use hypertext
>>
>>
>> There are many things which can be arranged.
>> but it reminds me of… the boarding pass redesign. :)
>> http://passfail.squarespace.com/
>>
>>
>> I have no designer talents but I guess you are talking about something  
>> along.
>> http://www.la-grange.net/2011/12/05/w3c-spec-status-prototype
>
> Love it.

Many kinds of awesome.

cheers


-- 
Charles 'chaals' McCathieNevile  Opera Software, Standards Group
     je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg kan litt norsk
http://my.opera.com/chaals       Try Opera: http://www.opera.com
Received on Wednesday, 7 December 2011 12:58:35 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 10 March 2012 06:19:18 GMT