W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > spec-prod@w3.org > July to September 2011

Re: Placing Abstract and Sotd in table of contents

From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 13:03:19 -0500
Message-ID: <4E67B1E7.7090908@aptest.com>
To: spec-prod@w3.org
I agree.  However, this is apparently something W3M wants so...  I just 
bow and scrape.

On 9/7/2011 12:58 PM, Liam R E Quin wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-09-07 at 12:15 -0500, Shane McCarron wrote:
>> I was recently asked by the PFWG to ensure the Abstract and Sotd are in
>> the ToC.  This doesn't seem like it is normal W3C house style, so I
>> certainly wouldn't do it as a default.  However, would anyone object to
>> my adding this as an option?  Otherwise I am going to have to mark up
>> the ReSpec-based PFWG documents by hand!
> Or override the template that generated the table of contents in XSLT,
> which is probably not too hard.  However, putting things in the table of
> contents that occur before the table of contents is not too useful on a
> Web page, and is likely to confuse readers...
> Liam

Shane McCarron
Managing Director, Applied Testing and Technology, Inc.
+1 763 786 8160 x120
Received on Wednesday, 7 September 2011 18:03:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:42:19 UTC