W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > spec-prod@w3.org > July to September 2010

Re: RDFa in ReSpec

From: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@kellogg-assoc.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 12:28:16 -0400
To: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
CC: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>, Spec Prod <spec-prod@w3.org>, Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
Message-ID: <5E3C9456-9800-4D22-B644-6C1BE8E9E909@kellogg-assoc.com>
Doing this in the context of ReSpec2 should be even easier, but the explicit modular nature makes it difficult. I've been considering folding the module inclusions into a single driver file, as it's easy to loose some step you depend on.

Gregg

On Aug 17, 2010, at 7:26 AM, Shane McCarron wrote:

>  No objection from me.  Note that in order to be valid for W3C 
> publication use you would need to make the default XHTML+RDFa.  I also 
> added XHTML generation, and it seems to work very well.  We even 
> published a spec the other day using it (RDFa Core and XHTML+RDFa 1.1).
> 
> On 8/17/2010 8:43 AM, Robin Berjon wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> I see that some here have been busy adding support for RDFa in ReSpec (both versions!). That's really cool.
>> 
>> Would there be any issue with turning it on by default (naturally keeping the option to turn it off)? If not, I'll proceed with the change.
>> 
> 
> -- 
> Shane P. McCarron                          Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120
> Managing Director                            Fax: +1 763 786-8180
> ApTest Minnesota                            Inet: shane@aptest.com
> 
> 
> 
Received on Tuesday, 17 August 2010 16:35:54 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 10 March 2012 06:19:17 GMT