- From: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@kellogg-assoc.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 12:28:16 -0400
- To: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- CC: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>, Spec Prod <spec-prod@w3.org>, Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
Doing this in the context of ReSpec2 should be even easier, but the explicit modular nature makes it difficult. I've been considering folding the module inclusions into a single driver file, as it's easy to loose some step you depend on. Gregg On Aug 17, 2010, at 7:26 AM, Shane McCarron wrote: > No objection from me. Note that in order to be valid for W3C > publication use you would need to make the default XHTML+RDFa. I also > added XHTML generation, and it seems to work very well. We even > published a spec the other day using it (RDFa Core and XHTML+RDFa 1.1). > > On 8/17/2010 8:43 AM, Robin Berjon wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I see that some here have been busy adding support for RDFa in ReSpec (both versions!). That's really cool. >> >> Would there be any issue with turning it on by default (naturally keeping the option to turn it off)? If not, I'll proceed with the change. >> > > -- > Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120 > Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180 > ApTest Minnesota Inet: shane@aptest.com > > >
Received on Tuesday, 17 August 2010 16:35:54 UTC