What if we remove the "#" entry entirely? _ Ian On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 10:02 -0700, Susan Lesch wrote: > Thomas Baker wrote: > > Section 12 of the Manual of Style says that "number sign" > > should be preferred to "crosshatch" when referring to the > > symbol "#". > > > > It may be worth noting that in the context of discussing > > identifiers, e.g. in [2], this symbol is referred to as a > > "hash". > > Changed to: > > usually not pound sign, hash, crosshatch or octothorpe > but hash namespace in SKOS Core > > Or is the use wider than SKOS? Maybe you will know a better way to describe > the exception. Thank you. > > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/06/manual/ > > [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-swbp-vocab-pub-20060314/ > -- Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs Tel: +1 718 260-9447Received on Thursday, 10 August 2006 17:04:17 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 16 March 2009 11:06:12 GMT