W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > spec-prod@w3.org > July to September 2004

Re: TR references checker

From: Dominique HazaŽl-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 17:55:02 +0200
To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Cc: spec-prod@w3.org
Message-Id: <1091030101.6022.477.camel@stratustier>
Le mer 28/07/2004 ŗ 17:50, Bjoern Hoehrmann a ťcrit :
> * Dominique HazaŽl-Massieux wrote:
> >> http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc-index.xml might be useful to extend it to
> >> check for RFCs. 
> >
> >Dan Connolly had come up with a script that turns this HTML list in RDF:
> >http://www.w3.org/2001/02pd/rfcIndexGrok.pl
> 
> Well, the script actually turns the text/plain index file into RDF and
> the document I referred to is XML not HTML... :-)

Oh, sorry for the confusion; I didn't look closely enough at the
references you gave; I guess I'll have to investigate it then :)

> >Hmm... In fact, due to the way the checker works as of today, this
> >wording would likely be more confusing;
> 
> Well, I thought of something like
> 
>   There are newer versions available for the following references:
> 
>     +-----------+-------------+
>     | Reference | New version |
>     ...
> 
> That should not really confuse anyone...

That's my ultimate goal, but as it stands, I can't  systematically find
what's the new version of the draft; i.e., I know that a draft is
outdated if its URI is not in tr.rdf, but that's the only information I
have. Getting the latest version would require more processing.

Dom
-- 
Dominique HazaŽl-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/
W3C/ERCIM
mailto:dom@w3.org


Received on Wednesday, 28 July 2004 11:55:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 5 February 2014 07:19:00 UTC