On Monday 16 June 2003 08:04, Ian B. Jacobs wrote: > When I refer to a stable Rec, I use the dated version. When > I refer to a document that's not yet a Rec, I refer to the > dated version of the latest draft AND include a "latest version" > link as well. I believe the practice is to say what you mean, which IMHO means that for normative references one always provides a pointer to a dated version. (One can't normatively include the unspecified future, though in xmldsig we did get very closing to that with some of the Unicode specs and addendums! <smile/>) If your intent is to track another version then saying as much and providing both makes sense. Regardless, for a auto-biblio generation, I certainly want the dated versions.Received on Monday, 16 June 2003 10:14:16 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 10 March 2012 06:19:12 GMT