W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > spec-prod@w3.org > April to June 2002

Re: Doc for XMLspec - Validity

From: Eve L. Maler <eve.maler@sun.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2002 14:27:42 -0400
Message-ID: <3D06411E.8050907@sun.com>
To: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@sun.com>
CC: spec-prod@w3.org

Sorry folks, that document is *really* old.  I think the sources may 
even be in SGML (need to check).  I will try to get the HTML output 
compliant, but it may take me a few days to look into this.

	Eve

Norman Walsh wrote:
> Hey, Eve, the sources aren't checked into that directory!
> 
> |> The usual QA and grumpy rant ;) about Guide to the W3C XML 
> |> Specification ("XMLspec") DTD, Version 2.1
> |> 	http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/06/xmlspec-report
> |> 
> |> This document is not HTML or XHTML valid :). Please could you make it valid.
> |> Thank you very much
> |> http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/06/xmlspec-report
> |
> | Hmm... I thought tidying it would fix it, but now I get these:
> 
> I think running it through the stylesheets again will fix it, too. Or
> most of it. The AEN IDs are a dead giveaway that the HTML was created
> with Jade in the pre-XSLT days.
> 
>                                         Be seeing you,
>                                           norm
> 


-- 
Eve Maler                                    +1 781 442 3190
Sun Microsystems XML Technology Center   eve.maler @ sun.com
Received on Tuesday, 11 June 2002 14:27:13 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 10 March 2012 06:19:11 GMT