W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > spec-prod@w3.org > April to June 2002

Re: Testable assertion tagging for W3C specifications

From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 6 May 2002 16:07:35 -0400 (EDT)
To: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@datadirect-technologies.com>
cc: <scott_boag@us.ibm.com>, <spec-prod@w3.org>, <w3c-query-editors@w3.org>, <www-qa@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0205061604240.5803-100000@tux.w3.org>
Well, this has been done with the WAI guidelines (WCAG - Recommendation may
1999, ATAG rec feb 2000, UAAG and XAG in draft stages) and is being followed
up with the QA framework because it worked well for WAI. It has undergone a
few minor tweaks as we have more experience with it.

Another approach is to look at the testing experience in SVG, MathML, CSS -
all of whom have large test suites and results from them.

Chaals

On Mon, 6 May 2002, Jonathan Robie wrote:

  It sounds like we have an experimental idea that may or may not turn out to
  be helpful, but which we suspect is likely to result in an as-yet-unknown
  amount of work.

  As a first step, I would suggest testing this on a small scale with a spec
  where the editors are particularly interested in trying this.

  Jonathan


-- 
Charles McCathieNevile    http://www.w3.org/People/Charles  phone: +61 409 134 136
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative     http://www.w3.org/WAI  fax: +33 4 92 38 78 22
Location: 21 Mitchell street FOOTSCRAY Vic 3011, Australia
(or W3C INRIA, Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France)
Received on Monday, 6 May 2002 16:07:36 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 10 March 2012 06:19:11 GMT