W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > spec-prod@w3.org > October to December 2001

Re: Oddity in pubrules

From: Bert Bos <bert@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 14:51:51 +0100
Message-ID: <15392.39799.609020.621774@jfouffa.inria.fr>
To: chairs@w3.org, spec-prod@w3.org
Misha.Wolf@reuters.com writes:
> Hi Janet,
> As pubrules are under discussion, I'd like to raise the matter
> of the errata link in RECs.  A couple of months ago, it was
> proposed that this be moved into the "header", rather than stay
> buried in the SoTD section.  I forget where it was discussed,
> but there appeared to be consensus to make this change.  I see
> that it has not been implemented, eg:
>    http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-WebCGM/
> What is the next step?

That discussion[3][4] led to the sample Rec[1] being modified. It now
shows a compact way of adding not only errata, but also translations
and alternative formats in the head.

But it is true that the sample is two clicks away from the
pubrules[2]. Ian promised that somebody from the comm team would
change the text, so, while waiting for that, I just added a direct
link to the sample Rec.

[1] http://www.w3.org/StyleSheets/TR/REC-sample
[2] http://www.w3.org/Guide/pubrules
[3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/chairs/2001OctDec/0011.html
[4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/spec-prod/2001OctDec/0008.html

  Bert Bos                                ( W 3 C ) http://www.w3.org/
  http://www.w3.org/people/bos/                              W3C/INRIA
  bert@w3.org                             2004 Rt des Lucioles / BP 93
  +33 (0)4 92 38 76 92            06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France
Received on Wednesday, 19 December 2001 08:51:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:42:16 UTC