W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > spec-prod@w3.org > October to December 2001

Re: spec-prod, xmlspec, docbook and Co.

From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2001 11:31:00 -0400 (EDT)
To: "Eve L. Maler" <eve.maler@sun.com>
cc: <spec-prod@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0110221130330.23460-100000@tux.w3.org>
OK, agreed. Further, I think this is a useful direction to be going. (as one
of the non-users of XMLSpec ;-)

Chaals

On Mon, 22 Oct 2001, Eve L. Maler wrote:

  At 12:05 PM 10/21/01 -0400, Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
  >well, if we added some RDF into the document...

  Right -- either RDF, or XLink arc roles that are harvestable as RDF if you
  wish...  My point was that you can't tell by inspection what the semantic
  is; a human has to decide and record it.

           Eve
  --
  Eve Maler                                    +1 781 442 3190
  Sun Microsystems XML Technology Center   eve.maler @ sun.com


-- 
Charles McCathieNevile    http://www.w3.org/People/Charles  phone: +61 409 134 136
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative     http://www.w3.org/WAI    fax: +1 617 258 5999
Location: 21 Mitchell street FOOTSCRAY Vic 3011, Australia
(or W3C INRIA, Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France)
Received on Monday, 22 October 2001 11:31:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 10 March 2012 06:19:11 GMT