W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > spec-prod@w3.org > October to December 2001

Re: spec-prod, xmlspec, docbook and Co.

From: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2001 17:35:08 -0400
Message-ID: <3BCDF98C.CDF232BB@w3.org>
To: "Eve L. Maler" <eve.maler@sun.com>
Cc: spec-prod@w3.org
"Eve L. Maler" wrote:
> This isn't practical in the general case.  For example, how would you be
> able to tell, by looking at the thing linked to, that a reference to
> another W3C specification is normative vs. non-normative?  I realize that
> XMLspec currently doesn't make this distinction, but it's something that
> has been brought up a few times.

I sent a proposal one month ago [1]. Note that I used the role attribute in
order to not change the DTD but any other solution is welcome, as long as it
is included in the xmlspec/docbook dtd.


[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/spec-prod/2001JulSep/0035.html
Received on Wednesday, 17 October 2001 17:35:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:42:16 UTC