W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > spec-prod@w3.org > January to March 2001

Minutes from 27 February 2001 BOF

From: Wendy A Chisholm <wendy@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2001 09:54:40 -0500
Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.20010307095208.02644100@localhost>
To: spec-prod@w3.org
Hello,

Thanks to Max and Eric for scribing.  Here are the minutes.
http://www.w3.org/2001/03/07-specProd.html

Specprod BOF notes - 27 Feb 2001
Present: Mark Nottigham, Yves Lafon, Eric Prud'hommeaux, Hugo Haas, 
Philippe Le Hégaret, Susan Lesh, Karl Dubost, Wendy Chisholm (chair), Ian 
Jacobs, Dan Connoly, Charles McCathieNeville, Max Froumentin (scribe), Paul 
Grosso, Norman Walsh, Jean-François Abramatic (observer), music and beer.
Regrets: Eve Maler

Dan plays a blues riff

Susan: a bug in xmlspec produces all kinds of unnecessary tags when 
converting to HTML. Default attribute values are inserted in the output, 
like: rowspan="1", colspan="1".
Norm: That's a bug in the DTD.
ACTION (Norm): fix DTD and get Eve to use the cvs repository for xmlspec.

Dan: about the cvs repository, who has write access to the DTD and stylesheet?
Hugo: technically everybody.

Round The Table
Norm Walsh: maintaining the stylesheet and the DTD with Eve. One plan to 
add markup to DTD to do XML element content.
Paul Grosso (Arbortext): worked with Norm on DTD, used it on fragment 
interchange.
Eric Prud'hommeaux (W3C): sample application for me.
Mark Nottigham (Akamai): involved in IETF spec production and editing. 
Interested in W3C stuff.
Yves Lafon (W3C): to know what is going on here. Will need for XML protocol .
Max Froumentin (W3C): was involved in the stylesheet. Been in touch with 
folks who want to use the spec prod tools but don't know how to (which XML 
editor to use, etc.)
Dan Connolly (W3C): been editing DAML spec - which is HTML jabber. Started 
xspec prod list on a lark. Thinks XSLT is a great hammer to work with
Ian Jacobs (W3C): Worked on UAAG and HTML/CSS. UAAG in CR for 3 years. 
Built up our knowledge in nasty perl hacks. Tried to go from HTML to 
xmlspec prod. I hear folks wanting to start with HTML, not a custom DTD.
Dan: I'm not gonna invest in a DTD.
Wendy chisholm (W3C): co-editor of WCAG and some work on the perl scripts. 
Now that we'ere starting UAAG 2.0 I'm looking at XSLT. Still deciding 
between XHTML and a DTD.
Norm: so you migrated your spec to XHMTL to use XSLT to do what perl 
scripts used to do a small bit.
Karl Dubost (W3C): conformance manager, interested in seeing better quality 
in the specs and in translation issues.
Susan Lesh (W3C): proofread lots of specs in CR, PR and REC. Looked at 
markup and found table markup bug. should get rid of tables.
Dan: more to contribute in style guides. We'll see
Charles McCathieNeville (W3C): staff contact for authoring tool guidelines. 
Work from source html, final xhtml, generates toc, refs, multiple views of 
the same source. go to my home page and look. Review lots of specs for 
accessibility, did translations on Spanish. Work for WAI protocols and 
formats group making sure the specs themselves are accessible.
Philippe Le Hégaret (W3C): DOM wroking group, DOM WG products (spec, idl, 
java/ecmascript code, text version) are completely written in XML (using 
modified xmlspec DTD). not using XSLT, were using COST (by Joe English) for 
DOM1. Rewrote everything in java using the DOM.
Hugo Haas (W3C): got involved when I was W3C webmaster, now staff contact 
for xml protocols. Now working on publishing the first xml protocol 
document. Thought xmlspec prod was cool. Noticed that ALT generated on tables.
Philippe: also summary on tables.
Paul: we need some amount of trust. Fixing the stylesheet is ok but we 
should be conservative regarding the DTD.
Norm: but everybody will make their own version of it.

HTML or custom DTD?
Charles: lots of people use XHTML, they don't have a nice XML editing tool. 
Want to make spec prod available to a larger group of editors but don't 
want to teach them emacs. I want some kind of reasonable wysiwyg tool.
Dan: do they have HTML editors and no XML editors? Amaya is not accessible, 
it doesn't run on mac.
Charles: runs on my mac wendy: how long do people want to go? agenda: ... 
get from wendy ... chaals: propose shift accessibility (tools and docs) to 
the list * votes for ...till 19:30 ietf production issyues ian's perl 
scripts nroman, paul, chaals: vote for DTD issues chaals: editors and tools

Ian's perl scripts
Ian presents his perl scritps that have typed refs in the source (normative 
vs. not), tools to insure that user refs are defined, tools to strip unused 
refs, glossary. Dont have: calculating dependency graphs, generation of 
spec package for offline reading, PS and PDF single HTML. No multi spelling 
checks, duplicate words, tidy to produce XHMTL at the end all kinds of 
scripts to generate cross-linking index and sub index generation same with 
defined and instances. TOC, short and expanded, checklist of requirements 
(but strips out comments) want spec to be proven, and more fornal methods.
ACTION Ian: send this to the list

Philippe's DOM scripts
PLH introduces DOM groups cool scripts: crosslink, glossary, references 
don't have: normative and informative references, can't remove unused 
references.
Dan: make sure all biblio is ref'd in spec
PLH: done in DOM
Dan: all normative refs must be checked closely
Paul: how do you know normative refs? xmlspec DTD should be changed to 
reflect normative/non-normative refs.
Dan: editor writes it in the link...
Norm: I'm moving references to normative/informative section. and links are 
made appropriately. I claim whether my refs to a spec is normative or not
Others: doesnt' work, depends on the link
Mark: I approached this by: whether a ref is normative is defined by ...
Charles: I make a normative and an informative link to a document.
PLH: we also generate an automatic index at the end, with links and glossary
Wendy: documented?
PLH, Ian: no.
ACTION on PLH and Ian to document this to the list.

Susan: doc for xmlspec says that dtd does not yet specify format for 
reference entries (e.g. [1] or [XML]). Can we agree on what a reference 
looks like?
ACTION: susanL - bring this up on the list?
Karl: are not too many cross links an indication of a poor quality?
Dan: the XML schema spec demonstrates this prob ...
Norm: people don't like the blue text of cross references, too distracting 
when there are many of them in the text. e.g. XML schema part I. We want to 
change a way to do examples and tables. How do we change the presentation?
DanC: submit it to peer pressure. I trust your judgement.
Wendy: xhtml vs DTD
Danc: we don't want to agree on this, people can choose.
Charles: less stuff to maintain (e.g. XSLT) if everybody does same.
Hugo: allowing html gives control over style. DTD is content only.
DanC: this is maximum constraint. people do want to change style.
Charles: would be cool to collectively use references between specs: same 
glossary. The WAI glossary is shared between specs and accessed using xslt.
Paul: we want contents in the DTD not style. Norm can fix the style. No 
need to tell the author not to mess up.
Dan: we can all do it in xhtml.
Paul: chaals said that with xhtml people can see that it looks like.
Chaals: with xhtml people can see what it looks like, especially using 
editing tools.
Paul: we (Arbortext) have an xml editor, every platform but linux. Others 
companies do it too, Frontpage is a bigger risk
Danc: can use tidy
Chaals: other tools like dreamweaver can roundtrip xhtml.

Mark on IETF
Canonical form is ascii text, header and footer on each page, line length 
constraints. RFC editor will accept ascii text and nroff but big debate 
currently about using html. Tools that evolved: word macros, nroff macros, 
DTD described in RFC2369 with implementation in TCL that spits out nroff, 
HTML, and ascii. Works reasonably well: TOC, references
SusanL: can you point to an RFC that does it right?
Mark: all do. Most people like it for production (no headers or footers). 
Some private talk about tools to do process management and issue tracking, 
some commonalities with W3C
ACTION: Mark to send summary to specprod.
Danc: if process management spans out, can you send mail to specprod?
Mark: wierd dtd has lots of presentation in it
Hugo: how does Reagle do his specs? reagles are spit out for W3C and IETF
Dan: probaly uses Jim Davi's html to generate markup/sgml./specprod text 
from html.
Mark: you'll never get consensus in the ietf.
Mark: there is a schema version of the specprod DTD. I use henry's XSV.
Wendy: close
Other agenda items:
why doesn't DanC invest time in DTD development? (he made a comment as we 
went around the table and Ian wanted to know more).
XHTML vs. XMLspec DTD - had some discussion on this, but could probably use 
more.
Editors and tools - what are people using? Had a couple comments on this 
but not complete (my request).
Translation issues (Karl's request).
Examples - instead of tables use pre or other (Susan's request)
Accessibility of spec-prod tools (Charles' request).
How to make changes to the spec-prod DTD. Discussed a bit, but don't 
remember clear resolution (DanC's request).
Style guide - reference and how look (Susan's request)

Eric Prud'hommeaux, Max Froumentin

--
wendy a chisholm
world wide web consortium
web accessibility initiative
madison, wi usa
tel: +1 608 663 6346
/--
Received on Wednesday, 7 March 2001 09:44:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 10 March 2012 06:19:11 GMT