Re: Writing I-Ds and RFCs using XML

first, a correction: i've been writing "rfc 2222" and i meant to write "rfc
2223". oops!


> I'm not following. ...
> ASCII art is tricky. However, this bit only hassles those that need to
> present in both the IETF and W3C. One could have a graphic element type,
and
> an alternative type, which might even be included as the Web Accessibility
> Initiative encourages this sort of thing.

this is what i wanted to get across: something that produces output for 2223
and other more expressive formats is going to have to allow for duality...


> However, one day there might be neat SVG to ASCII art formats, AND you
never
> know, IETF might permit HTML/XML one day. <grin>

err, don't, uh, hold your breath...


> Do you have a public list set up for discussion of and maintaining 2629?
If
> not, would you mind having those discussion in this forum? Dan Connolly,
> would this be acceptable to you as the guy that started this list?

there isn't a list, per se, people send me email and sometime it gets
through [private joke to joseph]. we can certainly discuss it in this forum.
guess i'd better subscribe!

/mtr