- From: Philipp Hoschka <ph@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 22 Aug 1998 02:46:44 +0200
- To: smil-editors@w3.org
1) <?xml:namespace ns="http://www.w3.org/TR/PR-smil" ?>Š The namespace id should be the URL of the Rec, not of the PR 2) The rules for case 2 seem confused - why is it ok to have extensions when the DTD is > 1.0, but not ok for a document with a 1.0 DTD ? In both cases, extensions make the document invalid in the XML sense - how can it be possible for a 1.0 player to process content in an element that is empty in 1.0 ? - why are unknown elements, attributes and attribute values simply ignored ? why not make it mandatory that they must be qualified via a namespace ? Answer: if you implement this, you never get rid of the "a:" in a future version of SMIL. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Philipp Hoschka | http://www.w3.org/people/hoschka | | World Wide Web Consortium | MIT-LCS ph@w3.org | 545, Technology Square Tel:(+1) 617.258.0604 | Cambridge, MA 02139 Fax:(+1) 617.258.5999 | USA ----------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Friday, 21 August 1998 20:46:25 UTC