Re: Re: Edit: Extending SMIL 1.0

At 05:35 AM 6/3/98 EDT, Phoschka@aol.com wrote:
>I'd suggest we add 3:
>
>"3. The document contains a document type declaration for SMIL 1.0. In this
>case, it may not contain any non-SMIL 1.0 elements, even if they are declared
>using XML namespaces. This is because such extensions would render the
>document invalid"

Excellent!  Sold!

Rob

---
Rob Lanphier (robla@real.com)    Voice: (206)674-2322   Fax: (206)674-2699
RTSP: http://www.real.com/rtsp   SMIL: http://www.real.com/technology/smil

Received on Wednesday, 3 June 1998 05:45:07 UTC