- From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 21:50:33 -0500
- To: Elijah Lynn <elijah@elijahlynn.net>
- Cc: site-comments@w3.org
On Sep 20, 2013, at 9:09 AM, Elijah Lynn <elijah@elijahlynn.net> wrote: > Hi, > > > In section 1.3 (Terminology) of RFC2616 (HTTP/1.1) it defines: > > =================== > Variant > A resource may have one, or more than one, representation(s) associated with it at any given instant. Each of these representations is termed a `varriant'. Use of the term `variant' does not necessarily imply that the resource is subject to content negotiation. > =================== > > I am not sure if the use of 'varriant' with two r's is intentional in the above paragraph. > > Can someone please clarify? Hello Elijah, I see that in the original RFC: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2616.txt That has been reported as an error to the RFC editor: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc Ian > > Thanks, > > Elijah Lynn > www.elijahlynn.net > 903.Eli.jahs (354.5247) > -- Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs Tel: +1 718 260 9447
Received on Saturday, 21 September 2013 02:50:31 UTC