- From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 08:59:07 -0600
- To: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Cc: Juan Pedro Silva <jpsilvagallino@gmail.com>, site-comments@w3.org
On 18 Feb 2010, at 8:48 AM, Ian Jacobs wrote: > > On 18 Feb 2010, at 8:36 AM, Juan Pedro Silva wrote: > >> Hello, I'm writing to you with respect to a validation problem on http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/REC-html401-19991224/strict.dtd > > Hello, > > That file is not an HTML file, so it won't validate as HTML. > > It is a DTD (which has an entirely different syntax than HTML). > > Does that answer your question? Apologies, I misread your question. You ask: "Perhaps this file is not supposed to be validated as a schema." That seems correct (it's a DTD). I don't believe the XML Schema Validator (xsv) checks DTDs. I am not aware of an XML schema for HTML 4.01. There is one for XHTML 1.0: http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1-schema/ _ Ian > > _ Ian > >> I am working on some legacy web services (in particular, the WS-I >> SCM use case), and the when trying to marshal the schemas used by >> these WS errors are reported on the mentioned file. >> JAXB xjc tool reports: >> >> [ERROR] The declaration for the entity "ContentType" must end with >> '>'. >> line 81 of http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/REC-html401-19991224/strict.dtd >> >> and your own validator (http://www.w3.org/2001/03/webdata/xsv) >> reports: >> >> Error: Syntax error after <! >> in unnamed entity at line 78 char 3 of http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/REC-html401-19991224/strict.dtd >> >> Perhaps this file is not supposed to be validated as a schema. >> Anyhow, this is causing me a lot of inconveniences. >> Is there an alternative schema to substitute this dtd?, do you know >> of some workaround?. >> Thanks in advance, and best regards, >> Juan >> Pedro Silva > > -- > Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs/ > Tel: +1 718 260 9447 > > -- Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs/ Tel: +1 718 260 9447
Received on Thursday, 18 February 2010 14:59:10 UTC