The University of Trento fully supports Michael's point. Perhaps the Semantic Web group might put together a task force and make a very concrete proposal on how this could be done in a short time. In case, we volunteer for joining. Best, Paolo Michael Hausenblas wrote: > > Ian, > > Indeed, very nice job re design and usability. However, I think we should > also take into account what our 'customers' think [1], [2]: > > "so, are #semanticweb standards too complicated when even the new #w3c site > doesn't use them? #stopsnakeoil" > > "@iand apparently all of them: No (obvious) RDF export, no SPARQL API. Just > some (broken!) hCalendar items." > > This is indeed a poor message we send out - why don't we eat our own > dogfood? We have a couple of nice standards (RDFa, GRDDL, etc.) in this > area > and should well be able to demonstrate that we are able to use them, IMHO. > > Sorry for spoiling the party, but given the broad uptake of semantic > technologies in the governmental area (US, UK), the eCommerce domain > (GoodRelations), linked data stuff and Google and Yahoo! processing > structured data, I can't seriously explain to my colleagues or other W3C > customers why we don't have structured data (preferably in RDF) > available at > the new W3C site. > > Thoughts, anyone? > > Cheers, > Michael > > [1] http://twitter.com/bengee/status/4856670048 > [2] http://twitter.com/bengee/status/4856830531 > -- Paolo Bouquet, University of Trento WWW: http://disi.unitn.it/~bouquet/ Phone: +39 0461 882088/3383/2164 (DIT/lab/Eco) Skype: paolobouquet OKKAM id: http://www.okkam.org/entity/ok200706301185791252056 Google profile: http://www.google.com/profiles/111798966561524040078 --Received on Wednesday, 14 October 2009 13:35:19 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 24 October 2012 16:21:32 GMT