> I guess I must not have been subscribed to the right mailing list > while the > redesign was going on. I would also say that www-style is probably the wrong mailing list to bring this up on; site-comments seems a more appropriate mailing list to use for these sorts of problems. > Apparently the fact that I noticed on > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/site-comments/2009Sep/0005.html > didn't > get seen by the right people. I see from the email you linked to that Ian Jacobs replied (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/site-comments/2009Sep/0006.html ) to your initial email, and a resolution was settled on. > How on earth does the W3 reconcile the new styles' "body: font: > 13px..." in > http://www.w3.org/2008/site/css/advanced with best practices as > expressed on > http://www.w3.org/QA/Tips/font-size ? How is 13px in the new better > than user > default in the old? If not better, then why changed? > > Quoting that URL: > > 'Size: respect the users' preferences, avoid small size for content > > * As a base font size for a document, 1em (or 100%) is equivalent to > setting the font size to the user's preference. Use this as a basis > for your > font sizes, and avoid setting a smaller base font size > * Avoid sizes in em smaller than 1em for text body, except maybe for > copyright statements or other kinds of "fine print."' > > How does this hypocrisy happen? Why does the W3 need to be as rude > as most of > the rest of the web? Is it really possible to meet WCAG 2.0 while > setting > font sizes in px? Even if technically allowable, does it meet the > accessibility spirit? > > Is there some reason for not maximizing readability? Gray (#333) > text on > white background, though technically meeting the luminosity > threshhold, > really doesn't, since that standard presumes out-of-the-box settings > on a > brand new LCD, not one that is correctly set for an environment that > is not > as bright as a retail store shelf, or a faded older one whose > brightness and > contrast are already maximized to insufficient effect. > -- > The husband should fulfill his marital duty to > his wife, and likewise the wife to her husband. > 1 Corinthians 7:3 NIV > > Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 > > Felix Miata *** http://fm.no-ip.com/ >Received on Monday, 30 November 2009 08:19:50 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 24 October 2012 16:21:32 GMT