W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > site-comments@w3.org > January 2006

w3c convalidation image

From: Antonio <hinocki@email.it>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 08:14:20 -0600
Message-ID: <3812597154.20060118192041@email.it>
To: site-comments@w3.org



Hi,
this message is to report a difference i noticed while comparing codes of html
and css validation images.

These are the codes:

- html validation
  <p>
    <a href="http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=referer"><img
        src="http://www.w3.org/Icons/valid-html401"
        alt="Valid HTML 4.01 Transitional" height="31" width="88"></a>
  </p>

- css validation
<p>
 <a href="http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/">
  <img style="border:0;width:88px;height:31px"
       src="http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/images/vcss" 
       alt="Valid CSS!">
 </a>
</p>

What i noticed is that html validation hasn't got the image style
attribute, while css has.
This could cause a bad visualization of the image because the missing
attribute.
I solved adding the attribute. It was a good scripting school to get
the validation :D
Anyway I just wanted to report that to understand if it was a problem
or there is any reason for that.
Thank you for your job.
Antonio Angelitti

 

 

 --

 Email.it, the professional e-mail, gratis per te: http://www.email.it/f

 

 Sponsor:

 Ricevi  picture SMS per il tuo cellulare da Jamba!

 Clicca qui: http://adv.email.it/cgi-bin/foclick.cgi?mid=4609&d=18-1
Received on Friday, 20 January 2006 14:14:43 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 24 October 2012 16:21:29 GMT