- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2003 11:49:56 -0500
- To: Thierry Michel <tmichel@w3.org>
- Cc: site-comments@w3.org, Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
The list of XForms implementations http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/#implementations would be much more useful to me if, for each item there, it listed (a) platform, (b) license. Bonus points for (c) release date. Also, it's not obvious why some implementations are listed before others. I suggest either stating the ordering criteria or ordering them alphabetically or by release date or some such. Also, have you verified all of the claims made there? If you're quoting materials that you haven't verified, please make that clear (i.e. use <blockquote>). Hmmm... the sentence "The XForms 1.0 Public Test Suite is available on the W3C site." above the list suggests the things in the list pass the tests in that suite. I suggest adding something like" The XForms 1.0 Public Test Suite is available on the W3C site. Please use it to evaluate the implementatations and report any problems you find to the suppliers and/or to the Working Group. FYI, this is prompted by discussion of XForms and RDF... http://rdfig.xmlhack.com/2003/10/14/2003-10-14.html#1066149344.134172 -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Tuesday, 14 October 2003 12:49:58 UTC