W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > site-comments@w3.org > June 2003

Re: Question on labels

From: Susan Lesch <lesch@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 16:36:02 -0700
Message-Id: <p05111b05bb0c1ac86a2e@[192.168.123.158]>
To: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@sidar.org>
Cc: site-comments@w3.org

Charles McCathieNevile wrote:

>At Sidar we believe that the requirement to have default place 
>holder  text in search fields no longer holds, and causes some 
>usability  problems for people with motor disabilities. Although we 
>have not been  able to get a response from the WCAG group as to 
>whether or not they  believe that checkpoint 10.3 - Until user 
>agents handle empty controls  correctly, include default, 
>place-holding characters in edit boxes and  text areas [1] - applies 
>we would therefore suggest the following:
>
><label for="inputField">Search W3C<input type="...." etc="etc"  /></label>
>
>(We would also recommend not putting the search into the taborder 
>with  a tabindex different to the one it would naturally get - i.e. 
>in order  to change its tab ordering, move it on the page).
>
>><input type="text" accesskey="E" size="15" tabindex="1"
>>id="inputField" name="q" maxlength="255" value="Search W3C" />
>
>I'm interested in your view on this approach.

All of this seems reasonable. I have made these changes. Would you
please check to see that they are correct?

http://www.w3.org/#search

This mailing list is not the venue for making changes to WCAG, though.
I suggest that you contact WAI again about the search field text.

Thanks for writing, Charles,
-- 
Susan Lesch           http://www.w3.org/People/Lesch/
mailto:lesch@w3.org               tel:+1.858.483.4819
World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)    http://www.w3.org/
Received on Tuesday, 10 June 2003 19:36:09 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 24 October 2012 16:21:27 GMT