Ian Jacobs wrote: > > "Burnett, Glenn" wrote: > > > > Your page http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/CR-DOM-Level-2-20000307/references.html > > includes the link http://www.ecma.ch/stand/ecma-262.htm which is not valid. > > The correct link is shown below. > > > > http://www.ecma.ch/ecma1/STAND/ECMA-262.HTM Hi Glenn, Thank you for your report. I fixed the link in the May 10, 2000 version: http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/CR-DOM-Level-2-20000510/references.html I sent an email to ECMA two months ago and they replied that it is too difficult to provide a redirect for the old address (thankfully, the postal services don't work like this). PhilippeReceived on Friday, 14 July 2000 10:53:21 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:23:01 GMT