- From: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
- Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2018 22:53:59 -0500
- To: semantic-web@w3.org
- Cc: Hugh Glaser <hugh@glasers.org>
On 11/25/18 8:28 AM, Hugh Glaser wrote: > Just how much of bnode usage is about existence, as you > describe, and how much a single potentially nameable object > that the creating agent doesn't want to take the trouble > to name? The vast majority of bnodes that I have seen are the latter, though an example of the former was pointed out by William Waites earlier in this thread: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/semantic-web/2018Nov/0078.html The RDF Semantics 1.1 even explains that "a graph is not logically equivalent to its skolemization. Nevertheless, they are in a strong sense almost interchangeable": https://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-mt/#skolemization-informative David Booth
Received on Monday, 26 November 2018 03:54:21 UTC