Re: ✅ Literals as subjects Re: Toward easier RDF: a proposal from Nathan Rixham on 2018-11-25 (semantic-web@w3.org from November 2018)

From: Nathan Rixham <nathan@webr3.org>
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2018 02:41:12 +0000
To: Austin Wright <aaa@bzfx.net>
Cc: phayes@ihmc.us, Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>, David Booth <david@dbooth.org>, SW-forum Web <semantic-web@w3.org>, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>, "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@miscoranda.com>, Olaf Hartig <olaf.hartig@liu.se>, Axel Polleres <axel@polleres.net>
Message-ID: <CANiy74zXxZsn2znCm2XsrjyOzaDBtxH8QNwUoP_-=6_=+WJK6g@mail.gmail.com>

On Sun, 25 Nov 2018, 02:28 Austin Wright <aaa@bzfx.net wrote:

> However, if I should be able to make statements like this about strings,
> why not any data type? Why not an entire RDF graph, like { { <foo> a <bar>
> . } published “2014-02-28T00:00:00Z”^^xsd:dateTIme .  } ?
>

Very useful, +1

Received on Sunday, 25 November 2018 02:41:44 UTC