- From: Sebastian Samaruga <ssamarug@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 22:58:20 -0300
- To: Simon.Cox@csiro.au
- Cc: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com>, public-schemaorg@w3.org, W3C Semantic Web IG <semantic-web@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAOLUXBuF1p8xZ8_kShGO4ut-geXPsjsMiqPfgduJS-PErDjiGQ@mail.gmail.com>
Semiotically, an Event could be regarded as the occurrence of a Concept in
the form of a Sign for a given Object (metaclass / class / instance
relationship). Occurrences of entities happens as dimensional measures, not
only temporal or physical ('birthdays' could be a 'dimension'). Measures
bring Data from which Contexts (schema) could be aggregated. And from
schema one could infer Interactions or roles in behaviors (DCI OO design
pattern).
This is roughly sketched at:
https://github.com/ssamarug/ssamarug/blob/master/Metamodel.pdf?raw=true
I think dimensional modelling approach is not only useful in OLAP cubes but
also in the Semantic Web. For example in this Event / Period dilemma.
Is this discussion pertinent to the SW community in general (semantic-web)?
As this is an ontological issue I'm including the corresponding list.
Regards,
Sebastián.
http://exampledotorg.blogspot.com
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018, 10:38 PM <Simon.Cox@csiro.au> wrote:
> That is signified by the fact that '19 June 2018' doesn't have a name,
> only an index.
>
> An 'event' that happened on that day would probably have a name relating
> to the activity.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider [mailto:pfpschneider@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, 20 June, 2018 11:17
> To: public-schemaorg@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Historical events
>
> I think that ages are qualitatively different from events. Consider a
> very short age - 19 June 2018. As far as I am concerned that is not an
> event.
>
>
> peter
>
>
>
> On 06/19/2018 05:06 PM, Anthony Moretti wrote:
> > Look, I'm no temporal expert or anything, but maybe the problem is in
> > English it could be a continuum from "event" to "period" as the
> > interval of time being named gets longer, with no clear boundary.
> >
> > Mike's birthday party - an event
> > The Middle Ages - a period
> >
> > Because from a data modeling point of view they're the same (at least
> > as far as my modeling knowledge goes).
> >
> > So an unpopular solution I'm guessing would be to rename the type to
> > *EventOrPeriod*.
> >
> > So your previous example:
> >
> > The Black Death
> > superEventOrPeriod: The Middle Ages
> >
> > People's ideas?
> >
> > Anthony
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 4:10 PM Richard Wallis
> > <richard.wallis@dataliberate.com
> > <mailto:richard.wallis@dataliberate.com>>
> > wrote:
> >
> > Anthony,
> >
> > I’m not following your logic here. I don’t see a Period (of time
> from a
> > start time/date to an end date/time) as an event.
> >
> > ~Richard.
> >
> > Richard Wallis
> > Founder, Data Liberate
> > http://dataliberate.com
> > Linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/in/richardwallis
> > Twitter: @rjw
> >
> > On 20 June 2018 at 00:05, Anthony Moretti <anthony.moretti@gmail.com
> > <mailto:anthony.moretti@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> > That definitely works, but only if some definition of Period was
> > agreed on.
> >
> > The property periodEventOccurred would be a subproperty of
> > superEvent in any case:
> >
> > superEvent
> >
> > periodEventOccurred
> >
> >
> > So you could describe the same information using the existing
> term
> > right?
> >
> > The Black Death
> >
> > superEvent: The Middle Ages
> >
> >
> > Anthony
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 3:50 PM Richard Wallis
> > <richard.wallis@dataliberate.com
> > <mailto:richard.wallis@dataliberate.com>> wrote:
> >
> > Using a Period Type I would suggest a cleaner alternative
> way of
> > saying an event occurred during a period would be like this:
> >
> > {
> > "@context": "http://schema.org",
> > "@type": "Event",
> > "name": "The Black Death",
> > "Description": "A pandemic that spread throughout Europe",
> > "periodEventOccured": {
> > "@type": "Period",
> > "name": "The Middle Ages",
> > "approximateStartDate": "400AD",
> > "approximateEndDate":"1500AD"
> > }
> > }
> >
> > On 19 June 2018 at 23:41, Anthony Moretti
> > <anthony.moretti@gmail.com <mailto:anthony.moretti@gmail.com
> >>
> > wrote:
> >
> > I was referencing the development version of Schema, I
> > should probably reference production, sorry Roger:
> >
> > * https://schema.org/subEvent
> > * https://schema.org/superEvent
> >
> > To say some event happened during the Iron Age for
> example:
> >
> > Invention of iron plow
> > superEvent: Iron Age
> >
> >
> > Anthony
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 3:05 PM Muri, Allison
> > <allison.muri@usask.ca <mailto:allison.muri@usask.ca>>
> wrote:
> >
> > The google Cloud host is really slow and I think the
> 404
> > is a result of something loading too slowly. I could
> > probably publish this more reliably on my own
> website! I
> > generally just wait a bit and reload the page. Sorry
> > about that.
> >
> > Sent from my iPhone
> >
> > On Jun 19, 2018, at 3:58 PM, Roger Rohrbach
> > <roger@ecstatic.com <mailto:roger@ecstatic.com>>
> wrote:
> >
> >> I get 404 Not Found for both of those pages.
> >>
> >>
> >>> On Jun 19, 2018, at 11:50 AM, Anthony Moretti
> >>> <anthony.moretti@gmail.com
> >>> <mailto:anthony.moretti@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Isn't it already modeled by these properties?:
> >>>
> >>> * https://webschemas.org/subEvent
> >>> * https://webschemas.org/superEvent
> >>>
> >>> Events can exist in part-whole hierarchies, aren't
> >>> named periods just events high in these
> hierarchies?
> >>>
> >>> Anthony
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 20 June 2018 02:00:28 UTC