Re: Some minor changes on the RDFa context document

[removing RDFa from cc as this pertains to more general RDF and JSON-LD 
issues]

This is great, I wasn't aware of either of these context repositories.

A while ago, I created a registry of JSON-LD contexts used in the life 
sciences:
https://github.com/prefixcommons/biocontext

This include contexts auto-generated from non-semweb identifier 
registries such as identifiers.org, as is part of a larger effort 
prefixcommons.org

The underlying philosophy is that there can be no way to ensure that 
prefixes are globally unique. However, individual communities can 
guarantee unique prefixes in a local context (for example, 
obofoundry.org has unique canonical prefixes corresponding to ontology 
purls within the purl.obolibrary.org space). Tools can then be used to 
generate applicate-specific merged JSON-LD contexts, with the ability to 
detect and resolve conflicts when context files are merged.

How should I go about coordinating this effort with the efforts below?

On 7 Jan 2017, at 4:03, Ghislain Atemezing wrote:

> Hello,
>> Le 7 janv. 2017 à 08:07, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.com> a 
>> écrit :
>>
>> Prefix.cc <http://prefix.cc/> maintains a JSON-LD context with a 
>> number of prefixes [1]. W3C could certainly host another, which would 
>> just be a subset of the CSVW context.
>
> Linked Open Vocabulary also maintains a JSON-LD context at  
> http://lov.okfn.org/dataset/lov/context 
> <http://lov.okfn.org/dataset/lov/context>.
>
> HTH
> Ghislain
>
> ---------------------------------------
> Ghislain A. Atemezing, Ph.D
> Mail: ghislain.atemezing@gmail.com
> Web: https://w3id.org/people/gatemezing <http://www.atemezing.org/>
> Twitter: @gatemezing
> About Me: https://about.me/ghislain.atemezing 
> <https://about.me/ghislain.atemezing>

Received on Saturday, 7 January 2017 20:42:31 UTC