Re: Some minor changes on the RDFa context document

> On Jan 5, 2017, at 6:51 AM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:
> 
> Two entries have been added to the list of "reserved" prefixes, ie, those that may be included into the official vocabulary prefixes. These are odrl and as.
> 
> While these have no effect on current implementations and usage of RDFa and JSON-LD, be advised that, in the coming 1-2 months, three new prefixes may be added to the list:

Note that JSON-LD does not use pre-defined prefixes, so there’s no change necessary here. However, recall that CSVW does use the same prefixes as RDFa, so we’ll want to update the CSVW context accordingly.

Gregg

> oa: Web Annotation vocabulary 
> as: Activity (Streams) vocabulary
> dqv: Data Quality Vocabulary
> 
> The first two are part of planned Recommendations; the third one is defined through an (already published) W3C Note. These changes may require a minor update on existing RDFa implementations.
> 
> Cheers
> 
> Ivan
> 
> 
> [1] https://www.w3.org/2011/rdfa-context/rdfa-1.1 <https://www.w3.org/2011/rdfa-context/rdfa-1.1>
> 
> ----
> Ivan Herman, W3C 
> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ <http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/>
> mobile: +31-641044153
> ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704 <http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704>
> 
>